{"id":3584,"date":"2018-03-05T10:28:39","date_gmt":"2018-03-05T15:28:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yourlifeafterwork.com\/?p=3584"},"modified":"2020-04-16T14:47:24","modified_gmt":"2020-04-16T19:47:24","slug":"dont-know-social-security-can-hurt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yourlifeafterwork.com\/dont-know-social-security-can-hurt\/","title":{"rendered":"What You Don\u2019t Know About Social Security Can Hurt You"},"content":{"rendered":"
Professional baseball players have a special ability for making difficult plays look easy and easy plays appear difficult. Their talent is one of many things I appreciate about baseball, including the arrival of spring! Likewise, the world of finance is full of things that appear easy. But overlook something simple and your retirement plan can be caught off-base. Social Security is one such area.<\/p>\n
Baseball metaphors aside, most of this column\u2019s readers know that Full Retirement Age (FRA) is between 66 and 67. Most readers know they can begin taking Social Security benefits at age 62, but will \u201cforfeit\u201d 6% for every year they take Social Security before FRA. Some people even know they gain 8% for every year they delay their FRA, up to age 70.<\/p>\n
A well-informed reader will realize that the \u201cfile and suspend\u201d opportunity no longer exists for persons born after January 1, 1954. However, there is one big exception. Surviving spouses and eligible surviving ex-spouses can still make separate claiming decisions for their retirement and survivor benefits, regardless of when they were born.<\/p>\n
The financial planning community is aware of these opportunities and can help clients consider options. That doesn\u2019t mean that every planner realizes the topic needs addressed. Families without planners almost certainly don\u2019t know about the various options that should be discussed.<\/p>\n
The Inspector General for the Social Security Administration has discovered that most beneficiaries are missing out. Writing at www.InvestmentNews.com, Mary Beth Franklin noted, \u201cBased on a random sample, the inspector general found that 82% of current beneficiaries who are dually entitled to survivor benefits and their own retirement benefits would have received a higher monthly benefit amount if SSA had informed them of the option to delay their retirement application until age 70.\u201d In one example, the financial difference over a recipient\u2019s lifetime showed a 20% reduction in benefits paid compared to what was owed!<\/p>\n
The Inspector General said the Social Security Administration (SSA) needs to do a much better job informing individuals of their benefits. Perhaps that is true. But, I put this viewpoint under the same challenge as taxes. There are two tax codes in the U.S. Most people believe one tax code applies to the rich and another applies to the poor. They are wrong. There is one tax code for the informed and one code for the uninformed. Each week, we see individuals with million-dollar investment accounts and huge tax planning (not reporting) mistakes. Apparently, Social Security is no different.<\/p>\n